染雾高考英语议论文 篇一
标题：高考英语考试是否应该取消
近年来，关于高考英语考试是否应该取消的议论层出不穷。有人认为高考英语考试对学生的英语学习起到了积极的促进作用，应该继续保留；而也有人认为高考英语考试对学生的英语能力评估存在一定的问题，应该予以取消。就我个人而言，我认为高考英语考试应该继续保留。
首先，高考英语考试对学生的英语学习起到了促进作用。高中阶段是学生学习英语的关键时期，高考英语考试作为一种重要的评估方式，可以促使学生认真学习英语知识和提高英语能力。通过高考英语考试，学生可以系统地学习英语语法、词汇和阅读理解等基础知识，同时也能培养学生的英语听、说、读、写的综合能力。高考英语考试的存在，可以激发学生学习英语的兴趣和动力，提高他们的英语水平。
其次，高考英语考试对学生的综合素质评价起到了重要的作用。高考英语考试不仅仅是对学生英语知识掌握的检验，更是对学生综合能力的评估。高考英语考试注重综合能力的培养和提升，包括了阅读理解、写作、听力和口语等多个方面的考察。通过高考英语考试，可以全面了解学生在英语学科方面的能力和素质，为学生的综合评价提供了重要的参考依据。
然而，也有人认为高考英语考试对学生的英语能力评估存在一定的问题。他们认为高考英语考试过于注重应试技巧和机械记忆，忽视了学生的语言运用能力和创造思维。此外，高考英语考试的题型和内容与实际生活和工作中的英语使用存在一定的脱节，无法真正反映学生的英语实际应用能力。因此，他们主张取消高考英语考试，采取其他方式来评估学生的英语能力。
综上所述，高考英语考试在促进学生英语学习和综合素质评价方面起到了重要的作用，应该继续保留。然而，我们也应该反思高考英语考试的问题和不足之处，并不断改进和完善评估方式，以更好地适应学生的英语学习和实际应用需求。只有这样，才能更好地发挥高考英语考试的作用，为学生的英语学习和发展提供更好的支持和指导。
高考英语议论文 篇二
标题：高考英语考试应注重实际应用能力评估
高考英语考试是中国高中生的一次重要考试，对学生的英语水平评估起着重要的作用。然而，近年来有人认为高考英语考试过于注重应试技巧和机械记忆，忽视了学生的实际语言运用能力和创造思维。因此，我认为高考英语考试应该更加注重学生的实际应用能力评估。
首先，高考英语考试应该减少对应试技巧和机械记忆的依赖。目前的高考英语考试题型和内容过于固定化，偏重于对语法和词汇的考察，而缺乏对学生实际语言运用能力的考察。这样的考试方式容易导致学生只注重应试技巧和机械记忆，而忽视了对英语的实际应用能力的培养。因此，高考英语考试应该适当减少对应试技巧和机械记忆的考察，更加注重对学生实际应用能力的评估。
其次，高考英语考试应该增加交流和口语能力的考察。英语是一门实际应用广泛的语言，口语能力是学生实际应用英语的基础。然而，目前的高考英语考试对学生的口语能力考察相对较少，主要集中在阅读理解和写作方面。为了更好地评估学生的英语能力，高考英语考试应该增加口语能力的考察，通过口语测试或者口试的方式来评估学生的交流能力和口语表达能力。
此外，高考英语考试应该更加注重学生的创造思维和实际应用能力。目前的高考英语考试题型和内容相对单一，缺乏对学生创造思维和实际应用能力的考察。为了培养学生的创新能力和实际应用能力，高考英语考试应该增加开放性的题目和任务，鼓励学生进行创造性思考和实际应用。
综上所述，高考英语考试应该更加注重学生的实际应用能力评估。通过减少对应试技巧和机械记忆的依赖，增加对口语能力和交流能力的考察，以及注重学生的创造思维和实际应用能力的评估，高考英语考试可以更好地反映学生的英语实际应用能力，为学生的英语学习和发展提供更好的支持和指导。
高考英语议论文 篇三
Air transport is increasingly used to export types of fruits and vegetables to countries where those plants can’t grow or out of season. Some say it is a good thing, but others consider this use of air transport can’t be justified. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Air transport is commonly used to move fruits and vegetables to places where those farm products can’t grow or are out of season. The benefits of such business are obvious, but air transport also creates a number of problems.
Transport of fruits and vegetables by air enables consumers to enjoy a wider variety of fresh and in-season farm products from all over the world. Not only is air transport good for consumers, it is also a blessing for farmers because the market is no longer restricted by regions. As a result, air transport increases the sale volume by selling more products in more places.
Moreover, air transport of food has now become a major resource of incomes for air companies. In the past, air companies’ business mainly came from serving passengers. However, facing an increasingly tough market, air companies need to expand their share of market to serve a wider range of customers in order to stay in the game and make a profit. With a booming economy and more money to spend, people create a great potential for food transport business and good margin for air companies.
In spite of such benefits, air transport is not free of problems. One major issue is high cost. Air transport is probably the most expensive way of transport. Higher costs entail high prices, which in turn deprive people with less money the opportunities to enjoy such privileges. So air
transported food is now for the rich, a fact that is unfair for poor peo
ple. In addition, it is not the best option to solve problems by transporting food from outside for places where certain kinds of fruits does not grow. The most optimal way, it seems to me, is that we should change the environment required by such plants using scientific and biological methods such as creating suitable soil and temperature. Such solutions will be proven to be ultimately cost-effective and fundamental.
More importantly, research indicates that air transport pollutes the environment. For example, Britain transports half its food by air.
However one kilo New Zealand fruit emits five kilo warm house gas on its way to destination. Therefore, some environmental groups and books advocate people to distinguish local fruit and air-transported fruit in an effort to cut the pollution from food consumption.
高考英语议论文 篇四
Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
I think it is true that in almost every country today each household and family produces a large amount of waste every week. Most of this rubbish comes from the packaging from the things we buy, such as processed food.
The reason why we have so much packaging is that we consume so much more on a daily basis than families did in the past. Convenience is also very important in modern life, so we buy packaged or canned food that can be transported from long distances and stored until we need it, first in the supermarket, and then at home.
However, the amount of waste produced is also a result of our tendency to use something once and throw it away. We forget that even the cheapest plastic bag has used up valuable resources and energy to produce. We also forget that it is a source of pollution and difficult to dispose of.
I think, therefore, that governments need to raise this awareness in the general public. Children can be educated about environmental issues at school, but adults need to take action. Governments can encourage such action by putting taxes on packaging, such as plastic bags, by
providing recycling services and by fining households and shops that do not attempt to recycle their waste.
With the political will, such measures could really reduce the amount of rubbish we produce. Certainly nobody wants to see our resources used up and our planet poisoned by waste.
高考英语议论文 篇五
any people argue that in order to improve educational quality continuously, students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on teachers. Others think the respect and discipline in the classroom will disappear. Which opinion do you prefer?
There is dispute over whether or not students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on teachers. Some people maintain that it is a good way to improve educational quality, whereas others are confident
that if students do it, the respect and discipline in the classroom will disappear. Every man will hesitate but if asked to make a choice between the two. I would not hesitate to choose the former over the latter. There are some major causes for it. In the first instance, the
improvement of students is the final goal of education. Only by giving comment on teachers’ performance can let teachers know the process of students’ development clearly. Furthermore, the criticism is the stimulus to teachers’ self-perfection and improvement in educational quality. Last but not least, the criticism itself is a kind of feedback and communication between teachers and students, lack of which will affect the educational outcome afterwards.
Although each nutshell has concave and convex sides, weighing the pros and cons of the argument, I’m inclined to agree with the former point of view although it has posed a tremendous challenge to teachers and thus the entire educational system.
If the students have courage to make comments on their teachers, they will have more confidence to conquer the difficulties in the future. As a Chinese proverb says, “the waves behind drive on those behind, so the new excelsthe old.” Teachers will find their own disadvantage in the teaching to again and again.
高考英语议论文 篇六
When the plant grows too large for its original part. It needs to be reparted. This can be done quickly and easily if you follow this instructions. First, you should cut off the bottom of the part with small stones. Then put two inches of soil on top of the stones. After making a hole in the centre of the soil, you can get the plant into the soil. Next add more soil into almost reaches the top of the part. Pressed the soil with your thumbs. Finally water the plaint.
